Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrate pallet-transaction-storage and pallet-indices to benchmark v2 #6290

Conversation

programskillforverification
Copy link
Contributor

Part of:
#6202

@programskillforverification programskillforverification force-pushed the benchmarkv2-transaction-storage-and-indices branch from 15eb72d to e802014 Compare October 31, 2024 07:21
@programskillforverification
Copy link
Contributor Author

@shawntabrizi Could you add R0 label for this kind of pr? I think it's unnecessary to write prdocs for every pallet. They are similar.

@gui1117 gui1117 added the R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes label Nov 7, 2024
@gui1117
Copy link
Contributor

gui1117 commented Nov 7, 2024

Even with r0 we still need semver for now AFAIK #6285

substrate/frame/indices/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
substrate/frame/transaction-storage/src/benchmarking.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@re-gius re-gius enabled auto-merge November 8, 2024 10:48
@re-gius re-gius added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 8, 2024
@re-gius
Copy link
Contributor

re-gius commented Nov 8, 2024

/cmd prdoc --bump patch --audience runtime_dev

@re-gius re-gius enabled auto-merge November 8, 2024 15:08
@re-gius re-gius added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 8, 2024
Merged via the queue into paritytech:master with commit edf79aa Nov 8, 2024
195 of 197 checks passed
@re-gius
Copy link
Contributor

re-gius commented Nov 15, 2024

/tip small

Copy link

@re-gius A referendum for a small (20 DOT) tip was successfully submitted for @programskillforverification (12gcYUJzFF4x2kdBAZu5zbRd6o7HitBb3iRMuiVtemYuvBEt on polkadot).

Referendum number: 1294.
tip

Copy link

The referendum has appeared on Polkassembly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
R0-silent Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants